On November 30, 3M filed a accusation adjoin Ivoclar Vivadent in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota advertence Ivoclar has affianced in a alternation of acts that "create a real, accurate altercation amid the parties and aggregate a bright blackmail that Ivoclar AG and Ivoclar Inc. will sue 3M for contravention of the '006 patent."
On December 1, Ivoclar did just that, filing a apparent contravention accusation adjoin 3M in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
The apparent in catechism is U.S. apparent No. 5,936,006, "Filled and Polymerizable Dental Material," which was issued to Ivoclar in August 1999.
Ivoclar contends that 3M is actionable the apparent through the auction of its Filtek band of products, which cover "amorphous SiO2 particles in a liquid, amoebic burning agent, wherein the SiO2 particles are organically alike treated, accept an boilerplate admeasurement of 10 to 100 nm and are nonagglomerated," according to the Ivoclar complaint.
In artefact literature, 3M has accustomed Filtek as including "a aggregate of nonagglomerate/nonaggregated 20-nm silica fillers," the Ivoclar accusation states.
Ivoclar contends that 3M "had effective and absolute ability of the '006 apparent and the inventions embodied therein in beforehand of the absolution of Filtek Supreme into the exchange ... accepting filed abundant apparent applications citation the '006 apparent as allegedly pertinent above-mentioned art. 3M knows and/or has accepted that the '006 apparent was appropriately issued to Ivoclar and proceeded with an considerately adventuresome apathy for Ivoclar's apparent rights."
Ivoclar has aswell filed clothing adjoin 3M in Germany alleging contravention of German apparent No. 196,17,931, which it claims is accompanying to the '006 patent.
No comments:
Post a Comment